Welcome To The Front Porch Swing

WestChaseShops, used by permission

Tossing Ballast Overboard

I write today from the perspective of a mariner—but not a seasoned one.
My sailing experience is limited to one particularly lovely summer afternoon on a very small craft on Lake Erie, years ago. Since that time, I’ve enjoyed my share of fishing boats and even ski boats. My time on cruise ships has been largely focused on eating as much seafood as I can every chance I can in the dining hall.

Not once did I think about asking the ship captain about ballast tanks.

Probably because I didn’t know they existed.

Ballast, I have learned, helps stabilize the boat, keeping it on an even keel or trim. Ancient ships used solid ballast such as sand bags or large rocks that could be moved from one part of the vessel to the other at need. Live ballast is comprised of crew members on a sailboat leaning on the windwardside of the boat. Modern ships use water stored in tanks at strategic places.

Bottom line, ballast is necessary for safety and for economy on the ship.

So why, you ask, am I talking about ballast in today’s Front Porch Swing?

Throughout church history and right up until today there have been attempts to toss the Old Testament out of the ship. After all, the God of the older testament was angry and controlling. It was either His way or death or some severe punishment. God’s people, the Israelites, often made stupid choices—some so sordid we blush to read them in a church service.

But the God of the newer testament, Jesus Christ, is so loving, kind and gentle that everyone loves Him. Today several conservative Bible teachers, pastors and authors express concern that the older testament will prevent seekers from coming to saving faith in Jesus Christ. Strange miracles don’t float well in the skeptic’s sea. Thousands dying from a God-ordained plagues offends the sensibilities of post-moderns. And honestly, who reads poetry that doesn’t rhyme? The Creation account in Genesis is like comic book material compared to the profound “truth” of evolution. Or at least…these seem to be the prevailing opinions.

Even Christian writers are producing books trying to make the Bible fit evolutionary theory. Or worse, tossing out the Genesis account completely.

All right, then. Why not? Why not just “unhitch” the old, antiquated wagon with squeaky wheels and a doubtful cargo? Why not remove all those offensive and ridiculous stories and just read the new edition.

I deliberately chose to use the word “unhitch” because Andy Stanley, a well known, respected (at one time at least) pastor and author has written a book entitled, Irresistible. Stanley uses the word unhitch to encourage his readers to essentially discard the older testament. Just share Jesus. His warning is that we will lose an entire generation of post-moderns.

I first read about Stanley’s book in a Christianity Today article. The last edition of World magazine contains a stinging review of Stanley’s book. Having read Marvin Olasky’s review of Irresistible caused me to wish Olasky would evaluate God In His Own Image when it is released next June. The contrast between my book and Stanley’s is dramatic. My book begins with a clear statement that we cannot pick and choose between the Old or the New Testaments. We don’t have two different Gods in two distinct books.

I have chosen throughout my book to use the terms “older” and “newer” testaments. Old suggests it is very old and probably outdated. But the fact is, we have but one book, the Bible, consisting of an older and newer section. How can we unhitch what God has “yoked” together? We have 66 books written by 40 authors over a period of 1500 years in two major languages but bound together by one story, one theme.

How can I say I love Jesus and reject His Bible, the one He used in the synagogue? How can I accept Jesus or even understand and appreciate what He taught without the older testament? Jesus quotes from the older testament. He treats the characters in the first half of the Bible as real people with true stories about their feats and failures. Can I accept Jesus as the greatest teacher and reject Jonah or Noah, the first mariner? (I wonder what Noah used for ballast?)

No, I believe what post-moderns and every other seeker is looking for is authenticity and truth. When the church service becomes the theater or a rock concert, why should they come? Better venues and better bands perform in the other culture outside the church. The Church is God’s family, where broken people like you and me should remove our masks to authentically love one another—including the postmodern whose life is empty after pursuing all this world offers.

God’s love and truth, both in the older and newer testaments—even when it is difficult to absorb and receive—is the ballast to keep the ship trimmed and on even keel on increasingly stormy seas. As Jesus firmly stated, “The gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”

Beware of tossing the ballast overboard.

You may not like where your ship ends up.

Thanks for visiting The Front Porch Swing today.

Perhaps some of the stories in the older testament trouble you; would you prefer to “unhitch” the older testament to avoid embarrasment or offending a seeker?

How do you feel about using the terms “older” and “newer” instead of Old and New Testaments?

I welcome your comments and input. Please invite your friends to join us.

http://welcometothefrontporchswing.home.blog

Welcome To The Front Porch Swing

WestChaseShops, used by permission

The Rage against God (Part 2)

Last week,I suggested that both atheists and theists have motives for their belief systems.

When King David declared, “The fool says in his heart there is no God,” he identified skepticism and atheism as a heart problem, not an intellectual one. In other words, being free from God is part of the skeptic’s wish list.

I suspect most atheists, when they’re being honest, admit they prefer there to be no God, and therefore no judgment. Last week I quoted Peter Hitchens, formerly an avowed atheist, who confessed that after burning his Bible he felt “free”—free from rules and free from fear of judgment. He also shared the confession of Thomas Nagel, professor of philosophy and law at New York University, and author of The Last Word: “It isn’t just that I don’t believe in God…. It’s that I hope there is no God! I don’t want there to be a God; I don’t want the universe to be like that.” (pp. 149, 50, emphasis mine)

Now as for me, I admit that I prefer an orderly universe with rewards and consequences at the end of life. Either position—God or no God—requires faith.

One of the men at The Shepherd’s House where I volunteer likes to declare his belief that there is no God and the Bible is a human book filled with fairy tales. I admit he has added pizzazz to our class discussions. I confess I am also coming to love him as a potential brother. I commend him for his honesty, and we hug after almost evey class session.

So what difference does it make if we believe in or deny God’s existence? Can’t we just agree to disagree? Of course. But we must also bear in mind that there are critical issues at stake—issues that affect both the individual person and our culture.

Consider the second part of Psalm 53:1: “They (the fools) are corrupt, doing abominable iniquity; there is none who does good.”

Is that overstatement? Perhaps. We all know skeptics and unbelievers who are good citizens who do admirable charitable acts. But, we can’t do anything that will appease God or earn brownie points with Him.

David warns that choosing to exclude God leads to other choices resulting in destructive behavior. Paul affirms this truth in Romans when he says that people who once knew about God suppressed that truth—a willful choice driven by their motives. The result has been the perversion of the entire human race. Consider the litany of bad behavior, in Romans 1:29-32, that has resulted from the decision to ignore God.

There is a price to pay whenever a nation chooses to toss the Rulebook under the bus or to deny God’s existence or relevance. The inevitable results include chaos and eventually anarchy—the law of the jungle where the strong rule over the weak.

So how do we decide what is good and what is evil…what is right and what is wrong? Postmodern thinking and the emphasis upon individual freedom have created a culture of moral relativity. It’s a replay of the book of The Judges, where “every man did what was right in his own eyes.”

Nobody will be safe, and no one held accountable for their actions. It is essentially war in the streets. In literal military warfare both sides (the good men in white hats or the evil men in black) are often guilty of committing atrocities. That is why modern nations have adopted rules of warfare. Unfortunately, too often the rules are ignored. This is especially true in atheistic states that attempt to erase every vestige of religion and God.

In his book, The Rage against God, Peter Hitchens writes, “Atheist States have a consistent tendency to commit mass murder.” We need not look any further than Soviet Communism under Stalin with an estimated 6-9 million non-combatant deaths. Or consider Chinese Communism under Mao zedong with up to 70 million civilian deaths. Today there is a renewed attempt in China to resist the expansion of Christianity. Consder the atrocities under the totalitarian dictatorship in North Korea or Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge.

I admit horrible atrocities have occurred in the name of religion—even Christianity. But, that was religion gone awry. It was wrong and flew against the teaching of Jesus who instructed His followers to turn the cheek and forgive their enemies.

Without God it is impossible to determine right and wrong. Your “truth” may not be my “truth.” Who then decides what is good or bad? Consider the following quote taken from Tim Keller’s recent book, Making Sense of God:

Russian philosopher Vladimir Solovyov sarcastically summarized the ethical reasoning of secular humanism like this: “Man descended from apes, therefore we must love one another.” The second clause does not follow from the first. If it was natural for the strong to eat the weak in the past, why aren’t people allowed to do it now?” (42–43)

Keller concludes, “While there can be moral feelings without God, it doesn’t appear that there can be moral obligation.” (178)

Without an absolute set of rules we are free to create our own. Is marriage a lifetime covenant between one man and one woman or a temporary agreement to “hang out together?” Without the Rulebook who determines if the fetus in the womb is a real human being? Unfortunately, the choice is too often based upon motives. Even avid pro-lifers have capitulated to convenience to avoid embarrassment.

I propose that there is only one reliable force to restrain evil: biblical Christianity.

When any culture seeks to remove the influence of religion and belief in God they create a vacuum—a vacuum that quickly fills with subjectivism and “the right to do as I please.” That is a culture without a compass to point the way or a lighthouse to warn of dangerous rocks beneath the surface.

Removing God in the Public Place has resulted in the rapid loss of civility. We are becoming just plain rude. Whether entrenched on the Right or the Left we seldom listen but shout over one another and insult one another.

Yes, there is a price to pay when nations rage against God, pronouncing Him irrelevant. I suspect part of their motivation is to resist any One who challenges their freedom to do as they please without accountability.

They may claim they are being rational or high minded in this. In reality, it’s just a shortcut to the gutter.

Do you agree or disagree? I welcome your feedback. Do you believe a culture can remain moral and survive without God?

Thanks for visiting The Front Porch Swing today. I welcome your comments and input. Please invite your friends to join us.

http://welcometothefrontporchswing.home.blog

Welcome To The Front Porch Swing

WestChaseShops, used by permission

The Rage against God

Why do the nations rage

and the peoples plot in vain?

The kings of the earth set themselves,

and the rulers take counsel together,

against the Lord and against his Anointed, saying,

“Let us burst their bonds apart

and cast away their cords from us.”

Psalm 2:1-3, esv

This blog may be the most relevant that I have shared. The title, The Rage against God, reflects Psalm 2. It is also the title of a book by British author, Peter Hitchens, once an avowed atheist, but now one of the most effective apologists for Christianity. The subtitle, how atheism led me to faith, describes his voyage from skepticism to faith.

I love good books, and especially the ones with backbone and meat. I always have a book or two that I’m reading. I recommend The Rage against God to every person, believer or skeptic. Hitchens’ rebellion against God began when he literally burned the Bible his parents had given him. Hitchens is an easy read because he places profound truths on the lower shelf. All following quotations from his book will be followed by page numbers.

Centuries ago, David wrote: “The fool says in his heart, ‘There is no God.’ They are corrupt, doing abominable iniquity; there is none who does good” (Psalm 53:1).

As I see it, there are two powerful truths imbedded in this verse. First, David claims that atheism is rooted in the heart, not the head. Second, the consequence of excluding God in any culture will always be destructive.

Think about this: Is it really true the fool (in this case the atheist) says in his heart that God doesn’t exist? Don’t most atheists claim their objections to God are rational rather? They claim that they find no rational evidence of God. But is it actually true?

In his youth, having burned his Bible as a declaration of freedom from God, Hitchens wrote, “We were all free now, and the Bible was one of the things we had to be free of.”

He went on, “At that moment I knew—absolutely knew—that it was the enemy’s book, the keystone of the arch I wished to bring down. I knew that there was no God, that the Old Testament was a gruesome series of atrocity stories and fairy tales, while the gospels were a laughable invention used to defraud the simple. And I joyfully and clearly understood the implications of all that.” (18, emphasis mine)

Did you catch Hitchens’ confession that he had a motive for denying God’s existence? He wanted to be free of God and Christianity. It was a heart problem. Without God, he would be free to do whatever he desired with no fear of eternal consequences.

Consider Hitchens’ confession:

This blatant truth, that we hold opinions because we wish to, and reject them because we wish to, is so obvious that it is too seldom mentioned. I had reasons for wanting that proof. (24, emphasis mine)

Later in the book he asks, “Might it be because they (atheists) fear that, by admitting their delight at the non-existence of good and evil, they are revealing something of their motives for their belief? Could it be the last thing they wish to acknowledge is that they have motives for their belief, since by doing so they would open up their flanks to attack?” (149)

Hitchens also quotes from another skeptic, Thomas Nagel, professor of philosophy and law at New York University, and author of The Last Word.

I want atheism to be true and am made uneasy by the fact that some of the most intelligent and well-informed people I know are religious believers. It isn’t just that I don’t believe in God and, naturally, hope that I’m right in my belief. It’s that I hope there is no God! I don’t want there to be a God; I don’t want the universe to be like that. (149, 50, emphasis mine)

So the psalmist was correct. Everybody has motives. Even me. I want good to be rewarded, and I want there to be a God who cares about me – a God who will ultimately punish those who think they have escaped punishment. The skeptic or atheist is motivated by hope there is no judgment after death—no hell.

Isn’t that the issue in Psalm 2?

Why do the nations rage and the peoples plot in vain?

The kings of the earth set themselves,

and the rulers take counsel together,

against the Lord and against his Anointed, saying,

Let us burst their bonds apart

and cast away their cords from us.

(emphasis mine)

We have barely scratched the surface of our topic, but it’s time to leave the porch. Next week let’s consider the negative impact excluding God has upon a culture.

On reflection, I believe we will find ourselves right in the middle of that impact.

(Peter Hitchens, The Rage against God, (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2010)

Thanks for visiting The Front Porch Swing today. I welcome your comments and input. Please invite your friends to join us.

http://welcometothefrontporchswing.home.blog

Welcome To The Front Porch Swing

WestChaseShops, used by permission

The Game Changer

Thoughts for this blog had been ping-ponging in my brain for several weeks before I discovered and read a book, Living Life Backwards, by David Gibson. The book may be the most practical study of Ecclesiastes I have ever encountered. Living Life Backwards is a reminder to live every day with the realization that every birth ultimately ends in death.

Today, I offer the challenge of believing backwards—starting with the resurrection of Jesus Christ and working backwards through our belief system.

Let me put it this way, have you ever struggled with the concept of a universal flood that blanketed the entire earth while Noah’s family and lots of animals enjoyed a ride in the first sea-going vessel ever built? Or, how about Jesus feeding thousands of people with a small boy’s lunch? Is that an easy sell to a skeptic?

Then there’s Peter, defying the Law of Gravity by strolling across the Sea of Galilee. That doesn’t fly in the physics lab at the university. And for that matter, neither does the Red Sea parting while an entire nation passed through on dry land.

Perhaps you or someone you know have struggled to accept these suspensions of natural laws—otherwise known as miracles. You want to believe, but the stories seem so untenable in our modern, scientific world. If so, I suggest a different starting point for constructing your personal belief system? Consider the nature of Christ and His resurrection. If I accept Christ’s resurrection, I can also accept other miracles in Scripture. I can build my belief system in reverse by starting from the resurrection and working backwards.

Two profound miracles serve as bookends to Jesus’ earthly life. They are like stakes driven deeply into the soil of conviction—or anchors securing the ship of faith in the face of severe storms of doubt. I am writing to professing believers—followers of Jesus—and sincere seekers who may struggle when critics challenge them about accepting seemingly absurd miracles.

However…if I truly accept the historical evidence supporting Jesus’ resurrection, I can also accept Him multiplying a boy’s lunch. After all, everybody knows dead men don’t rise again. Death is the terminal event of every life. There are no exceptions, barring a supernatural miracle.

If I believe that Jesus was miraculously conceived in the womb of a virgin, then I can accept He wasn’t just another average man. He was unique. One of a kind. He was both God and man, deity and humanity existing in one person. Therefore, as the Creator God, Jesus could most certainly suspend natural laws, walking on the very water He had created. He could reverse the effects of diseases. As the giver and sustainer of all life He could even defy death.

Maybe it all boils down to this: Do I really believe Jesus was the Son of God living in a human body? To deny Jesus came in real flesh, according to John, is to be a follower of the antichrist (1 John 4:1-3). The choice is pretty stark: Either I believe or I am not a Christian. And yes, it really is that simple.

But since I do believe that the eternal God “became flesh and made his dwelling among us,” I can also accept other miracles recorded in the four Gospels, including the resurrection.

In fact, the resurrection of Jesus is the game-breaker. Either Jesus literally, physically walked away from the sealed tomb or we have been following a myth, and Christianity that has no credibility. But if Jesus rose from the dead and walked among friends and skeptics, then everything else in the gospel story falls into place.

Some scholars claim the resurrection may be the most easily supported of all miracles in the Bible. Consider this: there were numerous eyewitnesses—over 500 saw the resurrected Christ at the same time. Several witnesses claimed they had seen, touched and even eaten with the resurrected Christ. Even more affirming, many were willing to die rather than deny what they had witnessed. People seldom, if ever, are willing to die for a lie. We just don’t. We love life and despise pain too much.

There is another problem for skeptics: the empty tomb and the missing body. To claim that the women, overwhelmed by grief, went to the wrong tomb is more difficult to sell than the truth. Did Peter and John make the same mistake? Why didn’t the soldiers guarding the tomb deliver the body? All Jesus’ critics needed in order to stop a rumor was to produce the corpse.

But they couldn’t.Because there wasn’t one.

That’s because the living Jesus Christ was out walking, teaching, and eating with His followers.

The stone was too large for the women to move even if they could sneak past the soldiers. The burial cloth was lying undisturbed but empty, like a butterfly’s cocoon. The linen cloth that once shrouded Jesus’ head was folded neatly in the corner—evidence that this was not a grave robbery. The Roman seal and the soldiers could not prevent the inevitable.

Millions of people all over the world and down through the millennia have heard the story, considered the evidence, and chosen to believe. One such witness stands out. Saul, one of the greatest skeptics who had dedicated his life to stamping out the myth of Jesus’ resurrection had a traumatic encounter on the road to Damascus. Struck blind and hurled from his mount in an explosion of radiance, Saul heard a Voice. When he asked who was speaking, the Voice said, “I am Jesus of Nazareth, whom you are persecuting.”

In that instant, Saul became a believer in Jesus. He did a 180, and began passionately preaching the very Good News he had once opposed with all his might. No amount of persecution and hardship, no matter how severe, could dissuade him. He was left for dead after being stoned. Flogged and chained in prison, he continued to proclaim Christ. Facing execution in Rome, he couldn’t be silenced.

Having witnessed the resurrected Christ, Paul now lived his faith system backwards. He jettisoned everything he had once believed and valued. Since encountering the living Christ, none of it mattered in the least. Everything and anything his enemies threw at him rolled off like water on a duck’s back.

The same can be true for you and me. Once we accept the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ all the pieces fall into place. We can embrace any and every miracle we encounter in the pages of the Bible.

The resurrection changes everything.

Thanks for visiting The Front Porch Swing today. If you appreciate these blogs please invite your friends to join us each week.

http://welcometothefrontporchswing.home.blog

Welcome To The Front Porch Swing

WestChaseShops, used by permission

Man Food

Several of the recent conversations on The Front Porch Swing have been heavy. Caution: more to come later.

But, this afternoon let’s just enjoy a few minutes together without deep theological issues or a sermonette.

My wife recently saw a quaint wooden sign at our local Hobby Lobby with rules for a front porch. It even had a swing on the sign so she snapped a picture with her I-Phone camera. I have been saving it for a day like today- beautiful, warm autumn afternoon in Central Oregon.

I trust you can read most of the guidelines for using a front porch swing effectively. Feeling the breeze. Enjoying friends and family. No flowers left to smell here but a few autumn colored leaves cling to the tree out front.

So, guys, what do you prepare for lunch when your wife is out shopping or sipping tea with her friends?

What’s the “go to item” in your “man cupboard?”

For me, when I am on my own to prepare a meal for myself, you can wager it will probably be something from the sea. I love seafood. On a cruise, I am a site to behold. Seafood for breakfast, lunch and dinner! Is that a taste of heaven?

But, left home alone today, I went to the pantry to retrieve my “go to menu.” A can of sardines, yep! I don’t dare fetch them when the grandkids are here lest I hear groans and threats to vomit from the aroma. Out of respect for Mary, I only eat the little fish when she is gone.

I know you all want the recipe so here it is: one tin of sardines, two slices of bread with butter, a dollop of yellow mustard and a slice of sweet onion topped with lettuce.

That’s it. I savor each bite- grateful for a little fish that sacrificed itself just for me. I eat to the glory of God and sense, I think, His pleasure. After all Jesus fed a multitude with a boy’s biscuits and sardines. Doesn’t get a whole lot better than that, at least not when I am home alone.

So, guys, what’s in your man cave pantry? What’s your go to item? Hey, if it is a sardine sandwich, ring me up.

Perhaps we can sit on our front porch and listen to the birds and the breeze while we imbibe on the bounty from the deep.

Thanks for visiting The Front Porch Swing today. If you appreciate these blogs please invite your friends to join us each week.

http://welcometothefrontporchswing.home.blog

Welcome To The Front Porch Swing

WestChaseShops, used by permission

When Good becomes Evil

I’m angry and approaching livid.

It upset me when I read the account of a 10-year-old boy in Tarboro, North Carolina, who was recently disciplined by his fifth-grade teacher for referring to her as “ma’am.”

Teretha Wilson said she noticed something was wrong when Tamarion got off the school bus from North East Carolina Preparatory School. “I asked him what happened,” she explained. “He said he got in trouble for saying ‘yes ma’am.’”

Tamarion pulled out a sheet of paper with the word “ma’am” written on it four times per line on both sides. He says his teacher told him to write the word on the sheet because he kept referring to her as “ma’am” despite her instruction not to. As part of his punishment, Tamarion also had to have the paper signed by a parent.

The next afternoon, Mrs. Wilson met with Tamarion’s teacher and the school’s principal. Mrs. Wilson also brought a separate piece of paper on which her son had written the definition of ma’am. (According to the Oxford Dictionary, ma’am is defined as “a term of respectful or polite address used for a woman.” The dictionary in my study adds, “…especially for a woman in authority.”)

I wonder how Tamarion’s teacher might have responded if the young boy had, like so many today, simply smarted off in class? Would she have responded as severely? I don’t apologize for using the word severe to describe a teacher humiliating a child who has been taught by his parents to show respect for adults. Honestly, I question who was the “childish” one in the classroom that day?

I suspect the prophet Isaiah might have responded, “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!” (Isaiah 5:20)

Just writing those words from Isaiah retrieves the memory of an autumn Sunday afternoon in the late 1950s. My uncle was listening to The Hour of Decision radio broadcast with his head literally bowed over the radio. Billy Graham had chosen the above text from Isaiah for his sermon—a sermon so powerful I can still hear his voice pronouncing Isaiah’s curse on those who dare call evil good and good evil. Billy was livid as he preached against the gross moral degradation in America back then in the “Leave it to Beaver” era. (Some of you younger readers may need to ask your grandparents about the Beaver.) Billy was warning about God’s judgment on cultural sins; things that now seem almost innocent. Billy Graham and Isaiah could have been describing our contemporary culture.

Before I continue, please hear my confession. My first sentence in this blog is not true. Sure, I was a little angry when I read about Tamarion Wilson being disciplined for calling his teacher “ma’am.” It wasn’t fair. In fact, it was downright wrong. Was I livid? No, not really. After briefly venting I forgot about all about Tamarion.

If you are really interested in seeing me reach “livid” on the anger chart, you need to be here the next time I receive another robocall offering me a low or no interest Visa account. Just got another call a couple of hours ago.

This company has harassed me with calls for almost two years. I have reported them to the government “no call” Website; I have punched #3 on the phone, as per their instruction, to say that I do not want to be called again. I’ve told them again and again (and again) that I am not interested. I have asked to speak to their supervisors who always promise to remove me from the list. On one occasion I actually threatened to come to Atlanta and hunt them down.

That’s livid, I guess.

But it’s also a shallow, selfish, rather carnal response to a minor irritation.

Unfortunately, I seldom approach livid when I see real injustice or when I hear somebody justifying same-sex-marriage. Even worse, in my mind, are those who not only publicly support such behavior but also demean and attack anybody who dares to disagree. That is calling what God calls evil, good.

So-called progressive thinkers today dare to call someone evil when they speak up in defense of the unborn. Perhaps you’ve heard about Chelsea Clinton’s statement that to roll back Roe vs. Wade is almost unchristian. My response? When is it unchristian to defend those who have no voice? “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil.”

Throughout the Bible, God clearly declares His concern for the vulnerable and warns those who would dare to oppress them. Who among us is more vulnerable than little children—whether in the one-time security of the womb or the classroom? Who is more vulnerable than newly arriving immigrant children? How about the elderly—once on the protected list, but today too often neglected, defrauded or even physically abused?

When did our culture get turned so upside down that wrong became right and right, wrong?

I am convinced the battle against the appointment of Justice Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court was less about his qualifications or character than the fear of having another conservative justice with traditional social values on the Supreme Court. It was more about being free to call evil good than doing something righteous.

To illustrate my point, consider Senator Cory Booker’s public comments back in July, shortly after President Trump nominated Kavanaugh and prior to any of the charges of rape Christine Blasely Ford leveled against the candidate. Booker used Scripture (Psalm 23 and credited it to Abraham not David) and stated that Kavanaugh was “evil” and anyone who supported his nomination was “complicit in evil.” Remember, these statements were made before any charges had been made against the justice’s character.

I can’t declare Justice Kavanaugh innocent or guilty. God knows every heart. But I am angry about the façade of liberal Democrat senators pretending their opposition to Kavanaugh was about something moral and good. Call it what it was! An effort to preserve status quo where right is considered wrong and wrong is right.

So is it right to be angry—even livid—today when I see wrong being justified? You bet it’s okay! God set the example throughout history.

If you think I speak as an old man, you’re correct. I grieve for the world we are creating for my grandchildren and great grandchildren. But I am encouraged when I remember there will be a day when God will have the last word—when the One true, righteous Judge renders the final verdict. He is the one true Supreme Court over all nations and every person who has ever lived, including Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, and even a group of senators playing charades.

Thanks for visiting The Front Porch Swing today. If you appreciate these blogs please invite your friends to join us each week.

http://welcometothefrontporchswing.home.blog

Welcome To The Front Porch Swing

WestChaseShops, used by permission

A Royal Invitation

Imagine receiving an envelope in your mailbox.

I’m talking about your real mailbox, not the icon on your smartphone

At first glance it’s unlike any letter you have ever received. Turning the envelope over you see a very official looking seal. Perhaps it even has a faint aroma…something royal. You read the following return address: Westminster, London SW1A 1AA, UK

What in the world? The postage mark on the unusual stamp is London, England. Curiosity drives you to carefully open the envelope right there on the street corner. Inside is another, more elaborate envelope with an invitation card like none you have seen. Trembling with anticipation you read: “Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth, invites you to a private audience with Her Royal highness including an informal afternoon tea.”

This isn’t the formal high tea served in the evening on a high table with a hot meal. No, this will be time with just you and the Queen, for the purpose of getting to know one another.

I think it would be wonderful. I would say yes immediately and start looking up ticket prices to Heathrow. But I’m not holding my breath. It will never happen, and what I get in the mail these days looks more like a bill or an ad. But honestly, what if? It would make me tremble just to think about it.

After all. Who am I? Just an ordinary guy living in Central Oregon. I wouldn’t know how to act in the presence of royalty. Is it appropriate to wipe my lips on the royal napkin? What if I choked on a scone or spilled my tea. And for that matter, what could we possibly talk about?

But maybe you know where I’m going with this.

There is a royal invitation. With my name on it. It’s waiting for me to open and accept every morning and every minute of every day. This invitation doesn’t come from the Queen of England. No! It comes from the High King of the entire universe. The Lord of angel armies. And when I think about it, if think long and clearly enough, it makes me tremble. If I am unworthy to spend personal time with the House of Windsor, how much more with the living God?

I invite you to read over my shoulder as I open this unparalleled invitation. After all, it has your name on it, too.

Therefore, brothers, since we have confidence to enter the Most Holy Place by the blood of Jesus, by a new and living way opened for us through the curtain, that is, his body, and since we have a great priest over the house of God, let us draw near to God with a sincere heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled to cleanse us from a guilty conscience and having our bodies washed with pure water. (Hebrews 10:19-22, niv)

In last week’s blog, Moses was restrained from entering the tabernacle by the cloud of God’s glory. Inside the tent a thick curtain separated the Holy Place from the Most Holy Place. Only the high priest dared enter the Most Holy Place or Holy of Holies—and that was just once a year on the Day of Atonement when he offered the blood of sacrificial animals for his own sins and also for the sins of his people. To make one minor mistake meant immediate death. Can you imagine the fear and intimidation the high priest experienced? There would have been no cocky, self-confidence performing this annual ministry.

Not so today. The author of Hebrews writes about ordinary people like you and me having confidence to enter “the Most Holy Place.” You and I have been invited into the very presence of the holy God. We are not trusting in the blood of an innocent animal but in the blood of Jesus Christ, the true Lamb of God, that was sacrificed once for all time for sinners just like us.

When Jesus died on the cross the evidential proof that this invitation is sincere was the ripping open of the curtain separating the two holy places in the temple. No longer do we need to depend on a human priest to present a sacrifice that satisfies God’s just wrath over our sins. Jesus is our high priest today. He is our Mediator and Advocate before the transcendent, holy God and invites us to come boldly, drawing “near to God with a sincere heart in full assurance of faith.”

Paul wrote, “In him and through faith in him we may approach God with freedom and confidence” (Ephesians 3:12, niv) Consider that for a moment. We—you and I—can approach God with confidence!

John affirms, “I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God so that you may know that you have eternal life. This is the confidence we have in approaching God: that if we ask anything according to his will, he hears us. And if we know that he hears us—whatever we ask—we know that we have what we asked of him” (1 Jn. 5:13-15, niv). Trusting in Jesus’ death, resurrection and ascension we can know we already enjoy eternal life and we can approach God with confidence, daring to speak with our heavenly Father.

Greg Morris, on the June 3, 2018 Desiring God Website wrote, “The question can never be, ‘Who are you to go God in prayer?’ The question now is, ‘Who are you to stay away when the King has invited you?’”

We are who God says we are in Christ. We have been chosen and are now His children—no longer orphans.

So why not open that envelope, sealed with the blood of Jesus, and accept the invitation to enjoy time in the presence of the King of Kings? Don’t worry about spilling tea or getting the napkin dirty.

Come just as you are, in Christ.

Thanks for visiting The Front Porch Swing today. If you appreciate these blogs please invite your friends to join us each week.

http://welcometothefrontporchswing.home.blog

Welcome To The Front Porch Swing

WestChaseShops, used by permission

Glimpses of Glory

I enjoy the older testament—or, at least most of it.

No, the genealogies don’t leap off the page and yank me to the edge of my seat. And to be honest, I used to feel the same way about the detailed instructions for the construction of the tabernacle and the stitching together of the priestly robes. With the passage of time, however, I have come to appreciate these preparations for Israel’s first House of Worship.

I briefly allude to the tabernacle in my book, God in His Own Image. In Exodus 25, Moses began to lay out detailed instructions for the construction of this portable wilderness worship center, including the utensils and furniture inside and outside the tent. The craftsmen assembling this holy place used over a ton of gold. Everything in the Most Holy Place was gold. Silver in excess of two tons also adorned the tabernacle. It is estimated that the cost of constructing the tabernacle would be 45 to 55 million U.S. dollars today.

Consider also the priestly garments. Gold, beaten as fine as thread, was woven through the fabric of the high priest’s robe. Twelve precious stones, including a diamond, were attached.

Everything about the tabernacle was spectacular. Trump Tower or the grandest hotel today would fade in comparison to the lavishness in that desert tent. I was breezing through Exodus 40 just recently, noting all the very specific directions for putting the tabernacle together and placing its furnishings. I’d read it many times before, of course, and was tempted to skim just a little. It seemed a little bit tedious as Moses went on to describe all the myriad details about dressing Aaron and his sons in their priestly vestments.

Reaching Exodus 40:33, I read: “So Moses finished the work.”

And that is where something happened to me. Or maybe in me.

As I continued to read verses 34 and 35, casually swinging my legs back and forth under the chair, I suddenly—almost involuntarily—found myself growing very still. I actually began to lean forward with anticipation as I read these words: “Then the cloud covered the tent of meeting, and the glory of the Lord filled the tabernacle. And, Moses was not able to enter the tent of meeting because the cloud settled on it, and the glory of the Lord filled the tabernacle.”

Imagine Moses, his heart racing with anticipation of entering the completed holy place for the first time. Perhaps he had even begun to walk toward the tent for the final inspection when The Cloud—the same Cloud that had led them day after day through wilderness en route to Mt. Sinai—began moving, rolling, toward the newly finished structure.

Was it subtle or more like an approaching storm? Either way, Moses froze in his steps. Aaron and Moses watched the Cloud, symbol of God’s presence, as it enveloped the entire tabernacle, hiding it from view. The next words leap off the page: “The glory of the Lord filled the tabernacle. And, Moses was not able to enter the tent….”

Glory is the Hebrew word “heavy.” To be made heavy was to be treated as important and to have great dignity. Our God is inscrutable. Awe inspiring. Beyond human comprehension. Filled with splendor and marvelous beyond description. Just a glimpse of such glory would knock us off our feet. That was exactly what happened when Isaiah saw the magnificent glory of the Lord filling the temple. Here in Exodus, God’s glory also filled the tabernacle blocking Moses’ approach.

I share a quote from my book, God in His Own Image:

“But the most important feature was not the gold or the eye-pleasing work of skilled artisans. All that creativity and beauty paled when “the cloud covered the tent of meeting, and the glory of the Lord filled the tabernacle. And Moses was not able to enter the tent of meeting because the cloud had settled upon it, and the glory of the Lord filled the tabernacle.”

I wonder, have we abandoned, by negligence or intentionally, the proper respect for God? Have we, by ignoring or glossing over His sterner attributes, made God into something safe? To do so is to fashion an idol.

Quoting from C. S. Lewis’s children’s classic, The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, Lucy asked Mr. Beaver if the great lion, Aslan, was safe. “Safe?” responds Mr. Beaver, “Who said anything about safe? ‘Course he isn’t safe. But he’s good. He’s the King, I tell you.”[1]

Let us never forget Jesus was and is the Lamb of God and the Lion of Judah. Both lion and lamb. Not lion or a lamb? He was God among us in flesh and blood. He is also transcendent and glorious and awesome beyond words. Ask the three disciples who stood on the Mount of Transfiguration.

John described it this way: “The Word (eternal One) became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory…” (John 1:14) To see Jesus, the authentic Jesus, is to see God’s glory—the same glory that prevented Moses from entering the tent and the same glory that thrust Isaiah to the floor.

Sadly, many who saw Jesus, heard Him teach and witnessed miracle after miracle ended up rejecting Him—preferring a Messiah made in their image. Knowing the cross was imminent, Jesus prayed for God’s name to be glorified (John 12:27-29). The Father responded audibly from heaven to any who wanted to understand. Most of them did not.

John quotes Isaiah 6 to explain the hardness of Jesus’ critics. John concludes in 12:41, “Isaiah said these things because he (Isaiah) saw his (Jesus’) glory and spoke of him.” Some religious leaders secretly believed on Jesus but feared excommunication because they “loved the glory that comes from man more than the glory that comes from God.”

I wonder, how might that describe theologians and preachers today who have created their own “safe” and popular Jesus because they prefer the glory and praise of men rather than glory of the awesome God who filled the tent in the shadow of Sinai?

Mr. Beaver had it right. He isn’t safe at all. But He is—eternally—good.

[1] C. S. Lewis, The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe, (New York: MacMillan Publishing Co., 1950, reprint 1976), 96

Thanks for visiting The Front Porch Swing today. If you appreciate these blogs please invite your friends to join us each week.

http://welcometothefrontporchswing.home.blog

Welcome To The Front Porch Swing

WestChaseShops, used by permission

Meet John Oldcastle, another hero of faith

I casually picked up one of my Bibles this morning, as is my routine, to read.

Three words in the above sentence, as I contemplated it, stand out : “casually, Bibles and routine.”

Each word emphasizes one simple truth. I take the privelege of reading the Bible for granted. I have several translations. I don’t tremble with amazement when I am holding The Bible in my hands. Yet, many of my fellow pilgrims would sacrifice greatly to have just a copy of John’s Gospel.

Last week, while visiting old friends in Tilamook, I was reminded by Lori Franke of a sermon I had preached over thrity some years ago in Portland. The word routine was part of the quote from Dr. Vernon Grounds that Lori reminded me of last week. I share the quote: “The ruts of routine become the grooves for God’s grace.” In other words, reading the Bible routinely (as a daily discipline) can reap benefits in a time of painful stress.

But in today’s brief, special edition of The Front Porch Swing, I want to share about a hero of faith who willingly gave his life so that I can casually hold a Bible in my hand each morning.

In today’s, September 29th, edition of “Today in Chrisian History”, a publication of Christianiy Today.com, I learned about John Oldcastle. Oldcastle was a follower of Wycliffe, the first translator of the Bible into the English language so that laypeople could read God’s Word. Wycliffe paid a still price for his “sin” in the eyes of the Roman Catholic Church at that time. John Oldcastle was condemned by Archbishop Arundel and given forty days to recant of his “heresy.”

John escaped and went into hiding in Wales until eventually captured and “roasted to death” on September 29, 1413. Burned alive so that I can casually pick up a Bible and read it in my mother tongue.

Someday, I hope to find Joh Oldcastle in heaven and embrace him along with Wycliffe.

Thanks for visiting The Front Porch Swing today. If you appreciate these blogs please invite your friends to join us each week.

http://welcometothefrontporchswing.home.blog

Welcome To The Front Porch Swing

WestChaseShops, used by permission

God in His Own Image- Recovering God’s Majesty

“Humph! You couldn’t raise much wheat here.”

So spoke Mr. Wutzke, a North Dakota farmer, as he gazed into the Grand Canyon for the first time. Having been raised on a Nebraska wheat farm, I can imagine one of my stoic ancestors saying the same thing. After all, if the land can’t produce grain, what value does it have?

What was wrong with Mr. Wutzke’s statement? It was true. Unless there is something going on in the bottom of the canyon that I don’t know about, I doubt that the Grand Canyon has ever sent a bushel of wheat or corn to market.

So even though the farmer’s statement may have been factually correct, it was the wrong response. I know, because I have stood almost breathless on both the north and south rims of the Canyon. The sheer majesty and splendor is almost disorienting on first glance. I don’t like overusing the word, but I think awesome fits very well here. Mr. Wutze’s view was too small for the occasion.

The same is true when we minimize, or worse, ignore the attributes of God that make us uncomfortable. To make God into our image is to make Him safe. Comfortable. Even cuddly.

Recently I met my acquisition editor from Moody Publishers. Drew authored a book, Yawning at Tigers, that deals with many of the same concerns I share in my book, God in His Own Image. In a chapter titled “The God Worth Worshipping,” Drew shared an illustration from the early church leader, Gregory of Nyssa. Comparing contemplation of God’s nature to standing at the edge of a sheer cliff with no foothold, Gregory of Nyssa wrote:

The soul…becomes dizzy and perplexed and returns once again to what is natural to it, content now to merely know about the Transcendent, that it is completely different from the nature of the things which the soul knows.

Drew writes, “When it comes to God, we’re all beginners.”

Last week I described Moses’ first impression about God at the burning bush. Remember also the response of the people as they stood on the foot of Mount Horeb waiting to meet God and hear His voice for the first time. To borrow words from a movie title, Moses and the people felt “a clear and present danger.”

I wonder, do we? Or, have we created our own safe version of God?

When we gather for corporate worship is there a sense of anticipation? Do we come with fear, respectful in the right sense of the word? Do we anticipate an experience that is extraordinary—even transcendent? That will only be true if we acknowledge God in His own image.

Just for a minute or two, let’s consider another man in the older testament who had a personal introduction to God. His story, in his own words, is recorded for us in Isaiah 6.

In the year that King Uzziah died I saw the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up; and the train of his robe filled the temple. Above him stood the seraphim. Each had six wings: with two he covered his face, and with two he covered his feet, and with two he flew. And one cried to another and said: “Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts; the whole earth is full of his glory!”

I know it’s difficult—and maybe even impossible—but try to experience that scene in your mind’s eye. The nation was grieving the death of a godly king. And then, in a moment of time, Isaiah suddenly saw the living God, the God of Abraham, seated on a high and lofty throne. Perhaps that describes one dimension of God’s holiness. He is separate from everything in all creation. In other words, other worldly. The train on His robe “filled” the temple—no skimpy Hollywood prop. The seraphim, gloriously bright angelic beings, recognized God’s transcendence and humbly covered their face and feet while calling to each other responsively, “Holy, holy, holy!”

So if you even felt a tinge of Isaiah’s experience, what was your response? But wait! (Sounds like one of those TV commercials pushing some great one-time-only deal if you call in the next sixty seconds.) The plot thickens. Listen. “And the foundations of the thresholds shook at the voice of him who called, and the house was filled with smoke.”

Now what is my response if I had been there? I am certain it wouldn’t be something bland like, “You can’t raise much wheat here.” Nor would I be singing a song with all the potentially offensive terms like holy or wrath or blood deleted.

Hear Isaiah’s response as he lay sprawled on the floor: “Woe is me! For I am lost; for I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell among a people of unclean lips; for my eyes have seen the King, The Lord of hosts.”

Paraphrasing in contemporary language, “I’m dead meat. I have a filthy mind speaking filthy words and living among filthy people just like me. I have seen the King! The king who is the Lord of hosts.” I wonder why I don’t feel like Isaiah when I try to pray or when I enter the worship center on Sunday?

Why don’t I anticipate experiencing an authnetic encounter with the living God? Why do I seldom feel the need to confess my filth?

Maybe one of the reasons people feel burned out or “done with church” is because we have lost the sense of awe over God’s holiness and transcendence. Some have said the reason fewer men than women attend church is that the church has become feminized—safe and predictable. I wonder what might happen if we had to put up warning signs saying “Caution, you are about to enter the presence of the holy God. Management is not responsible for injuries from falling off your chair.”

Yes, I’m joking. But, what would it be like to experience God’s presence—His transcendence—and to sense the conviction of the Holy Spirit making repentance and confession a natural response! What would it be like to leave the church building realizing, not just in my mind but experientially, that I have been forgiven—cleansed and my sin atoned. I would then be prepared to exclaim, “Here I am, Lord, use me anywhere you want.”

Is that impossible or is that true Spirit-driven-revival?

Thanks for visiting The Front Porch Swing today. If you appreciate these blogs please invite your friends to join us each week.

http://welcometothefrontporchswing.home.blog